<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Push or Pull?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glasshospital.com/2010/03/04/push-or-pull/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glasshospital.com/2010/03/04/push-or-pull/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=push-or-pull</link>
	<description>Demystifying Medicine One Week at a Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:54:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://glasshospital.com/2010/03/04/push-or-pull/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasshospital.com/?p=109#comment-102</guid>
		<description>You are correct that there is no solution under the current status quo.  The government expects the private sector to provide health care but then sets up a huge number of constraints and restrictions that prevent the private sector from succeeding.

Either a fully private system (like the US used to have) or a fully public system (like Canada has) offer a major advantage, namely that the decision-makers have flexibility and control and can make hard decisions.

The current US system of ambiguity between gov&#039;t, hospitals, insurance and individuals is not the recipe for success.  It is the recipe for a unending political battle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct that there is no solution under the current status quo.  The government expects the private sector to provide health care but then sets up a huge number of constraints and restrictions that prevent the private sector from succeeding.</p>
<p>Either a fully private system (like the US used to have) or a fully public system (like Canada has) offer a major advantage, namely that the decision-makers have flexibility and control and can make hard decisions.</p>
<p>The current US system of ambiguity between gov&#8217;t, hospitals, insurance and individuals is not the recipe for success.  It is the recipe for a unending political battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Grumpy</title>
		<link>http://glasshospital.com/2010/03/04/push-or-pull/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Grumpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasshospital.com/?p=109#comment-79</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have any answers. Have you looked into how this is done in other countries, such as Canada? I don&#039;t know if they have a different system for handling patient turnover. Although the payor system is different, the inner working of hospitals are similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have any answers. Have you looked into how this is done in other countries, such as Canada? I don&#8217;t know if they have a different system for handling patient turnover. Although the payor system is different, the inner working of hospitals are similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

