Back to School

For five years I worked at GlassHospital’s Student Care Center.

I don't get no respect, neither.

One of the great things about GlassHospital is that it sits on the campus of a well-known and fairly well-respected former Big Ten university.

(What’s that you say? That’s right….Big Ten…in the 1930′s! You can still go to the main athletic gym and see the very first Heisman Trophy!)

Like all colleges and universities, our place acts in loco parentis to the students that grace its campus. This means responsibility for our students’ health and well-being.

I loved working at the Student Care Center. Taking care of 18-22 year-olds and the occasional rowdy MBA student is completely different than the “grown up” patients I usually care for. My grownups frequently suffer from a multitude of chronic medical conditions like diabetes, high blood pressure, or shpilkes. Come to think of it, shpilkes is really the only affliction of the college-aged.

That and crabs.

One of the dirty little secrets of working in a place like Student Care is that if you work the morning shift, you have a lot of time in between patients since most college kids are busy “studying” all morning. Things tend to get much busier in the afternoon when the patients are actually awake.

For some reason, college health centers almost invariably have terrible reputations. Students love to badmouth the place. I know I did when I was a student. One perpetual legend is about how Mom and Dad get the billing statement from the student health center, and it always has a pregnancy test charge, even when the presenting complaint is “sore elbow.” This occurs especially if the patient is male.

It’s fun for the students to complain about the health center, just like they do about the cafeteria, the administration, and, if you live in Chicago, the weather.

But as my colleague Dr. Alex Lickerman points out in this article, students don’t know how good they have it.

College health advocates like to say that college is a formative time in which healthy habits can be achieved for a lifetime of wellness. My roommate from medical school, who now runs a college health service at an elite eastern institution, describes it as having the opportunity to “get ‘em where they are.”

By this, he means that when students come in with fears about STDs real or imagined, he preaches not only about safe sex and sexual health, but emboldens the students to think about more prosaic health habits for the rest of their lives. Like not picking up smoking, as a major example. With students, the die is not yet cast.

Working in student care, it was always interesting to try to find the transition point for students between Mom & Dad calling the shots ["You should go to the doctor....Did you go to the doctor?...What did the doctor say?"] to some form of graduated independence…like actually taking responsibility for health and other behaviors. Some of the firsts on the long road toward maturity.

Here’s to a great school year! Thanks for reading…

-GlassHospital

  • Share/Bookmark
1 Comment Posted in humor, narrative, patient experience, primary care, reminiscence
Tagged , ,
Doctor Yenta

GlassHospital has been featured in a publication produced down the road at FancyHospital.

I’m delighted to share with you the recently published issue No. 8 of Atrium, available free for download by clicking on the link here.

Many readers know of my ‘wisdom’ project in which I brought together a retired biochemist and a retired rabbi for a year to discuss ‘big issues’ in life from the viewpoint of two eighty year-old wise men.

The essay below was a featured Snapshot, on the theme of “Happy.”

*                    *                    *                    *

As an internist, I’m trained to do things:

I listen.  I ask.

I examine, order, and test.

And then I assess.

I certainly try to treat.  All too often, this includes prescribing.

What frequently gets lost in this paradigm is that on many occasions, the listening part is often enough.

Take Gene, for instance.  He’s a retired biochemist.  When I met him for the first time as a patient, I took a standard social history:  I asked about employment, hobbies, and habits.

“I’m emeritus,” he explained, sitting hunched forward in the chair, looking out from Harry Caray spectacles.

“What does that actually mean?” I pushed.

He told me about his walks, his weekly lunches, his mail, his invitations, his memoirs.  “Do you still do experiments?” I wondered.

“I dream about them every night,” he replied.

Pause.

His wistful admission pierced me.  I felt helpless; there was nothing I could do about his loss.  I ruminated on it for some time. Then I had a dream.  An epiphany of sorts: Emeritus came to me to mean lonely.

I knew another emeritus: my rabbi.  He, too, struggled to find the right balance between activity and restfulness in retirement. Why not bring them together to see what could happen?

Gene: an octogenarian Jew-turned-atheist; scientist; discoverer; and Renaissance man, passionate about music and art.

A.J.: an octogenarian rabblerousing Rabbi; social justice crusader; scholar; also a ‘fiend for culture’ (and his beloved White Sox!).

They were the same age.  Of similar backgrounds.  Neighbors for thirty years, though they’d never met.

I proposed a series of conversations.  Interviews, really, in which I’d ask them about their lives.  I wanted to understand their hopes, their dreams, their experiences through the tumult of the twentieth century. Gene was worried the rabbi would try to bring him back into the fold.  When I obtained assurances of no proselytizing, the dates were set.

We met for a semester every Thursday on a quiet corner of campus.  I brought the questions and the tape recorder.  Thursdays with Gene & A.J., we jokingly called it.

I tried to hit the big themes: work, accomplishments; family; their philosophies, politics, faith, and philanthropy.

I’m not sure why I did it.  I think I felt each man’s loneliness, and I hoped to lessen it by providing them companionship–with each other, and with me.

I also think I felt my own need for role models of well-lived lives. I hoped to nurture my non-medical self, by tapping into sprightly minds encased in enfeebled bodies and revealing their accrued wisdom.

It worked. A patient came to me with a problem and I did something: I helped him make a new friend.

  • Share/Bookmark
2 Comments Posted in books, death & dying, narrative, patient experience, reminiscence
Tagged , ,
Cruel Shoes

GlassHospital is on vacation this week, writing to you from vibrant Toronto.

Toronto is home to the Bata Shoe Museum, well worth a visit if you’re ever here on a Thursday night when admission is free. In addition to a display featuring shoes of Elton John and Shaquille O’Neal (among others), there is a nice historical series featuring shoes from the ages that seem very strange to someone from the 21st century.

Well, at least to me.

A Pair of Italian Chopines, circa 1600.

My family was intrigued by the tiny shoes that Han Chinese women wore during generations of the practice of footbinding. Beside those doll-like appendages, I haven’t been able to get over the chopines, foot high platform shoes worn by upper class women in Renaissance Italy.

All of this reminded me of a story about feet that shows some of the craziness of our technologically-driven health care system.

*                     *                     *

A thirtysomething friend of mine, let’s call her Sally, started running last year in an effort to get in better shape.

As often happens in these scenarios, Sally developed some foot pain. So she went to a “foot” doctor (I’m not sure whether she meant a podiatrist or an orthopedic surgeon specializing in feet).

Reasonably enough, the doctor ordered an x-ray of her foot. The official reading showed no fracture, but there was a “questionable” finding on the edge of one of the midfoot bones such that the doctor couldn’t rule out some more insidious process. A stress fracture, perhaps? Those can be awful, and take a long time to heal.

So, again in reasonable fashion, the doctor ordered a CT scan of Sally’s foot. This is the logical next step if a plain old x-ray is abnormal. Heck, a lot of the time, even when an x-ray is normal, we still order the CT scan looking for something that we can’t see on the x-ray.

And though I said this was a reasonable choice, if you really think about it, was it so reasonable?

I mean, did Sally really need a $1000 test to see what was causing her foot pain? If you’re Sally, you sure might think so. You want to know what the heck’s wrong. You want to know why you’re having pain when you run. You want to keep running. After all, as a primary care doctor, I LOVE it when a patient tells me that they’re serious about exercise. Aside from not smoking, that’s the best thing I can hear from a patient.

But Sally hadn’t traumatized her foot. She hadn’t dropped a bowling ball on it. She probably had an overuse syndrome. A repetitive stress injury. A running “tweak.”

The x-ray showed that, for heaven’s sake. We knew there was no broken bone. No smoking gun. [I told you, we hate smoking.]

So a week after sitting for the CT, Sally still didn’t know the result of her scan. She called the doctor’s office to no avail. She was put off by the staff, even told by a nurse she’d have to come in for an appointment to discuss the results with the doctor.

By this point, she’s worried. “Is there something terrible that he’s waiting to tell me?” she wondered. “Do I have foot cancer?”

Sally adjusts her schedule, dutifully shows up for the appointment, to hear the doctor tell her that her CT is normal. Did she really have to wait a week and have an office visit to find this out? That is one shoddy patient experience in my book.

Nevertheless, she reasonably asks the foot doctor what she should do about her pain.

Physical therapy? Low impact exercise (use an elliptical trainer, perhaps, or bicycling)?

She doesn’t get much of a concrete answer.

She decides to buy some new shoes.

She goes to a local shoe store that caters to runners. Let’s call it Fast Feet.

There, they measure her feet. No charge. Lo and behold, her feet have grown 1/2 a size.

Sally was running with shoes that were too small! That was the source of her pain. No CT was needed. In fact, probably even an x-ray was unnecessary.

Now, this story shows how when a patient comes to see a doctor, we often go right to diagnostics. We want to get you an answer, after all. We’re not shoe salesmen, for heaven’s sake. We don’t even have those thingie-dingies that measure feet. [Do foot doctors?]

Next time someone comes in complaining of foot pain, I’m going to ask them when the last time they had their feet measured.

[Editor's note: re: the title of this post, google Steve Martin and read about his books.]

*                   *                     *

[Editor's note #2: If you haven't been over to Slate to see the Medical Examiner column from last week, check it out here. Thanks for reading!

  • Share/Bookmark
8 Comments Posted in health & wellness, humor, medical mystery, narrative, patient experience
Tagged , , ,
Doc, How Long Have I Got? [UPDATED]

"Rage, rage against the dying of the light..."

[Editor's note: I've truncated this post because it was picked up by Slate for their Medical Examiner column. Check it out over there & feel free to comment there and here! -GH]

A year ago, U.K. officials released convicted Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset Ali Mohmet al-Megrahi to Libya on humanitarian grounds, based on a prediction that he had only three months to live. Karol Sikora, the British cancer expert on whose opinion the decision was based, recently owned up to his miscalculation to a London paper: “There was always a chance he could live for ten years, twenty years…But it’s very unusual.” The decision to release al-Megrahi was vilified by victims’ families, and the issue was placed on a short list of U.S. concerns in a recent meeting between President Obama and new British Prime Minister David Cameron.

Which raises the obvious question: How did Dr. Sikora get it so wrong?

To find out, head on over to Slate and read the whole article called “The Worst Fortune Tellers: Why doctors are so bad at predicting how long their patients will live.”

-GlassHospital

  • Share/Bookmark
4 Comments Posted in books, death & dying, patient experience, research
Tagged
Doctors & Advocacy

When I made the choice to be a doctor at a medical school I wasn’t sure exactly what ramifications (beside teaching the next generations of doctors) my job would have.

It became clear to me after a year that being an academic afforded me many privileges: of course, mentoring and teaching relationships, but also the security of letting a big institution worry about the business aspects of my practice (marketing, billing, and even malpractice insurance). Most prized of all was the ephemeral “academic” time, amount varying by year and commitments, that affords me the time to be creative (research, course design, teaching) or simply to catch up on amassed work. Something clicked and made me realize that this was a luxury that academics have that private practice doctors don’t necessarily get; and thus I reached a personal conclusion that we have an obligation to go beyond our mere doctoring (not taking that for granted) to work on some of the societal problems that underpin poor health.

I shared this opinion in a newsletter for the Society of General Internal Medicine, an academic society of doctors doing research, teaching and advocacy at our nation’s medical schools.

One doctor felt compelled to write a rebuttal, telling me, in essence, that physicians (academic or otherwise) have no special role in society beyond taking care of patients; that my idealistic notions of physician advocacy were overblown.

Read the essay below and let me know what you think:

*                         *                         *                         *

What are the societal obligations of a doctor?

Academic physicians have the privileges of caring for patients, training future doctors, and engaging in research.  But what is our obligation with regard to advocacy?  Are we required to become advocates, or can we declare, on the basis of our other missions, that we “give at the office?”  Since our academic homes are by and large non-profit institutions that provide under-reimbursed and uncompensated care, is it legitimate to claim that we contribute just by showing up?

To a large extent, advocacy is a natural outgrowth of our daily work, whether on behalf of a patient, a resident, a student, or for the benefit of our own research and careers.  Many of us become advocates through what amounts to happenstance—we are presented with a situation that seems obviously wrong—and we become engaged in finding solutions.  Others of us enter medicine with advocacy passions, though given the long training process, it can take us time to find our “faculty” voice.  A few of us, I suspect, having achieved faculty status, don’t want to rock the boat too much and risk jeopardizing what we have achieved.

Continue Reading »

  • Share/Bookmark
7 Comments Posted in advocacy, health care reform, health disparities, medical education
Tagged